Finnrick Avaliações 79

Quick results, easy to follow procedure for submitting samples. Simple to understand COA.

They don't respond to emails and I've paid for multiple test to be performed!
They aren't reliable! It's been over a month and I haven't heard anything back despite multiple emails.

Very smooth process. Wonderful work!

The process was super easy. The results only took a few weeks and I had them before I needed to use the peptides I had purchased. I was able to learn about the overfill in my batch vials and reconstitute accordingly.

Paid for private testing for 3 samples, my name was supposed to be listed as the customer on the COA’s . Received the results all the COAs show Finnrick as the customer. Have emailed them several times and received zero responses to any of my emails. Will never use Finnrick again.

Absolutely horrible when it comes to getting lab results to paying customers.

They charge over $200 for a test, take 3-4 weeks to get you the results, and don't return your emails when you ask about the status of your results. I wish they got your results back and responded to emails as fast as they charge your credit card.
I could have sent my sample to Jano overseas, paid 1/2 of what finnrick charged, and had my results within 10 days. I would never use their paid service again and don't recommend it.

Took a bit longer to get my results back due to a back log of tests. I am very pleased with the communication and professionalism during the process. I received an apology for the delay, which means a lot nowadays! I am very relieved with the results and the explanation of the tests, they were very detailed. Thank you.

I initially though what Finnrick is doing is a great way to bring transparency to the industry, however, once I became a customer of theirs I was thoroughly dissappointed.

If you send samples in for testing from vendors who pay to be part of their platform that vendor can contest results when they come back low. This happened to my sample and a week later I was issued a "corrected" report which changed purity and mass. In the corrected report there was no reference or link to the original report. This is SO bad on so many levels. If you test, get one result, then go over the result and find an error, the proper, scientific way to re-issue a report is to have all of that information there - not to hide the old information.

The vendor I used had multiple samples that tested poorly and had corrections reissued. You can track other corrections on Finnrick's site. I find it ODD that one vendor can have different products all testing poorly then get the same corrections, which brings me to my next point....

There are many reports that the lab they use, specifically Krause Analytical is very inconsistent compared to other labs. So with the way FR is set up it comes to two potential problems:

1. Vendors who pay to be part of their platform have the ability to get their results changed, this is a good thing if the results are literally wrong but, if they are literally wrong... why are they using that lab?

2. If the lab is THAT inconsistent, then the results on FR should not be trusted, because my assumption is that only pay-for vendors can request corrections. Which means every other vendor who has been tested there who isn't paying doesn't have the opportunity to correct faulty testing reports.

Lastly, before my correction was issued I paid for an additional test, once it was clear I could not trust this company I no longer wanted to test with them.

FR refused to refund my payment claiming it was "over 48 hours" and went against their "policy" to refund. There is NO policy (at least not at the time of this incident) anywhere on their website. And I LOOKED. Later they stated they would refund me but never did. So now I have to go fight the charge.

Seriously - do not waste your money with these absolute scammers.

It is so nice to have a lab that tests for free just to help people to make sure they have a legit product. Thanks so much.

Always trust Finnerick for all my testing needs!

Great service to make peptide community safer. Free & discreet.

Finnick provided a real free result of my sample. I can now trust using this for research. The turn around times was fairly decent. Can beat it for the price of free!

Has Some peptides that needed to be tested and found out about the guys over at Finnrick. Mailed the samples and these guys took care of the rest . Great experience.

Great communication! Quick results!! Thank You!!!

I had a great experience with obtaining results and being guided through out the process.

Finnrick has given me some peace of mind while buying from grey market sources...fast and free.
Finnrick is leading the way on peptide testing.

Finnrick has been awesome, great resource. They are getting very popular and test result times are taking over a month but you can’t beat the free service! 10/10

UPDATE: I had my RT40 retested and it came back 99.8% purity. So AGAIN RETEST IF you use Finnirick. Too bad they don’t let you update load photographic proof. Because I got proof.

You all need to take Finnirick pep testing with a grain of salt. They use Krause labs. A noted not reliable lab. A literal joke among labs. Then they rate companies on what this lab says. If you have gotten a negative test result from Krause Analytical, RETEST. You may be pleasantly surprised.

I used Finnrick for vial peptide testing and had a positive experience. The process was straightforward, and the report provided clear information on the peptide’s identity, purity, and quantity. I like that they use independent lab testing rather than relying only on vendor certificates, which adds an extra layer of transparency. Turnaround time was reasonable and the results were easy to understand. Overall, it’s a helpful service if you want additional verification of what’s actually in a peptide vial.