Embora não verifiquemos afirmações específicas porque as opiniões dos avaliadores são pessoais, podemos marcar as avaliações como "Verificadas" quando for possível confirmar que houve uma interação comercial. Leia mais

Para proteger a integridade da plataforma, todas as avaliações em nossa plataforma — verificadas ou não — são analisadas por nosso software automatizado, disponível 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana. Essa tecnologia foi concebida para identificar e remover conteúdo que viola nossas diretrizes, incluindo avaliações que não são baseadas em uma experiência real. Reconhecemos que talvez não consigamos detectar tudo e você pode sinalizar qualquer coisa que ache que possamos ter deixado passar. Leia mais

Veja o que dizem as avaliações

Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

OpenEvidence is recommending a debunked study. The study says Graded Exercise Therapy (GED) helps people with ME/CFS. It has since been proven that GED actively harms people with ME/CFS, sometim... Ver mais

Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

I have ME/CFS and your application is suggesting graded exercise therapy. This ranges from not helpful to actually harmful. Any Dr giving out this as a treatment could be subject to malpractice. The P... Ver mais

Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Gives harmful "treatment" advice for M.E/CFS that is outdated and debunked. Particularly the recommendation of GET which has been shown to be harmful to these patients. This tool is not good enough an... Ver mais

Avaliado com 5 de um total de 5 estrelas

Great AI scribe for clinical documentation. Includes timely research based evidence supported recommendations for treatment decision making.

Detalhes da empresa


Informações de contato

1,9

Ruim

O TrustScore é 2 de um total de 5

26 avaliações

5 estrelas
4 estrelas
3 estrelas
2 estrelas
1 estrela

Sem histórico de pedidos de avaliações

Esta empresa não convidou os respectivos clientes, portanto as avaliações podem não ser representativas

Como esta empresa usa o Trustpilot

Veja como as avaliações e classificações são obtidas, pontuadas e moderadas.

1,9

Todas as avaliações

(26)

2 avaliações nos últimos 12 meses

Escreva uma avaliação
As empresas no Trustpilot não têm permissão para oferecer incentivos ou pagar para ocultar avaliações. As avaliações são opiniões de usuários e não da Trustpilot. Leia mais

Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Harmful information that needs urgent review

To echo a lot of these others reviews, I am deeply concerned that OpenEvidence is recommending graded exercise therapy (GET) for ME/CFS. This guidance is outdated, inaccurate, and dangerous for patients. The NICE guidelines (UK) and other major health authorities have recognised that GET can cause significant harm to people with ME/CFS, yet OpenEvidence appears to be disregarding this evidence.

Patients with ME/CFS deserve accurate, science-based recommendations that prioritize their well-being. Encouraging GET risks worsening symptoms and contributing to long-term disability for many. OpenEvidence should immediately review and correct their recommendations to reflect current medical consensus and patient safety.

21 de fevereiro de 2025
Avaliação não solicitada
Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Treatments for ME/CFS are outdated

The treatments for ME/CFS given by the app are graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Both treatments have been debunked by studies. Feedback was given to the app, but the guidelines have not been changed.

19 de fevereiro de 2025
Avaliação não solicitada
Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Openevidence is using debunked studies.

Openevidence is using information found in studies that has been debunked. Graded exercise therapy (GET) is harmful to patients with ME/CFS. Doctors use Openevidence as a resource and are being given misinformation and subsequently are treating patients with GET causing potential harm. Stop using outdated and debunked studies. You are not Open (evidence) if you are not using evidence in your business model.

21 de fevereiro de 2025
Avaliação não solicitada
Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Open evidence is using outdated and…

Open evidence is using outdated and harmful information regarding one of the most debilitating illnesses in the world. This is dangerous for the health and well-being of the population of people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome). I have experienced extreme loss of quality of life and reduction in my baseline multiple times in my life due to forced GET and CBT treatments prior to the newer research being more widespread and known.

The most recent research and publications from providers around the world make it very clear that GET and CBT are not only unhelpful for patients with ME/CFS - they are actively harmful and may cause significant to permanent damage and deterioration to the patients’ baseline health.

Here's what the NIH says about these issues:

"The British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recently published its updated guidelines for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). NICE concluded, after an extensive review of the literature, that graded exercise therapy (GET) is harmful and should not be used, and that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is only an adjunctive and not a curative treatment."

Promoting false information about treatment for severe, debilitating, chronic illness that is still in need of vast funding and research for gain of effective treatment is amoral and threatens the already limited quality of life of every patient with ME/CFS. Please update the ME/CFS space with current, safe information based on the most recent, experienced, and authentic research efforts.

15 de julho de 2024
Avaliação não solicitada
Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Dangerous misinformation

OpenEvidence recommends GET (graded exercise) for ME/CFS patients, although this type of treatment can actively harm these people. GET can actually make them worse permanently.

21 de fevereiro de 2025
Avaliação não solicitada
Avaliado com 1 de um total de 5 estrelas

Warning: OpenEvidence Uses Outdated Information

OpenEvidence is basically the opposite of "UpToDate" because they use outdated information. If you're a doctor that is thinking about using OpenEvidence, think long and hard about the legal liability associated with recommending incorrect treatments. For example, OpenEvidence recommends graded exercise therapy (GET) for patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS). This recommendation is based on a medical guidebook that was published more than a decade ago (in 2012). In more recent years, the research supporting GET for ME/CFS was completely debunked and newer research has shown that GET is actually harmful for patients with ME/CFS. The NIH published new guidance in 2022 to make sure that doctors are NOT recommending GET for patients with ME/CFS. Doing so would be dangerous. But OpenEvidence does not mention this new guidance because it is relying on outdated information. I flagged this issue with OpenEvidence but they did not correct their AI. They are spreading misinformation that is harmful to patients. If a doctor recommends GET to an ME/CFS patient, the patient will get significantly worse and then the doctor is going to face serious liability for endorsing incorrect treatments.

20 de fevereiro de 2025
Avaliação não solicitada

Esta empresa é sua?

Reivindique seu perfil para acessar as ferramentas gratuitas da Trustpilot para empresas e se conectar com seus clientes.

Criar uma conta gratuita

A Experiência Trustpilot

Qualquer pessoa pode deixar uma avaliação na Trustpilot. Quem escreve uma avaliação tem a possibilidade de editá-la ou excluí-la a qualquer momento. As avaliações serão exibidas enquanto a conta estiver ativa.

Contamos com pessoas dedicadas e tecnologia inteligente para proteger nossa plataforma. Descubra como combatemos avaliações falsas.

Saiba mais sobre o processamento das avaliações da Tustpilot.

Aqui estão 8 dicas para escrever ótimas avaliações.

A verificação ajuda a garantir que pessoas reais estejam escrevendo as avaliações publicadas no Trustpilot.

Oferecer incentivos por avaliações ou pedir por elas seletivamente pode distorcer o TrustScore, o que vai contra nossas diretrizes.

Saiba mais